Archive for September, 2009
What A Week In Disaster!
What the heck is going on with the world? Tsunami in the South Pacific and the Smaon Enclave! Storm and flooding in Manila Philippines…. And now the Earth Quake in Indoniesia! Is this really the result of Global Warming??????? It’s kinda odd to see these things happening all at once.. My condolences to the families and those victims of this horrible weather phenomnenon.. Thanks Senoni
Original post:
Link here
What A Week In Disaster!
What the heck is going on with the world? Tsunami in the South Pacific and the Smaon Enclave! Storm and flooding in Manila Philippines…. And now the Earth Quake in Indoniesia! Is this really the result of Global Warming??????? It’s kinda odd to see these things happening all at once.. My condolences to the families and those victims of this horrible weather phenomnenon.. Thanks Senoni
Go here to see the original:
Link here
Supreme Court Returns to Firearms Fray
Posted by admin in general news on September 30th, 2009
Supreme Court Returns to Firearms Fray by Joan Biskupic USA Today September 30, 2009 WASHINGTON, DC The U.S. Supreme Court announced Wednesday it will return to the controversy over individual gun rights by hearing an appeal from a group of firearms owners in Chicago. They are challenging a lower appeals court ruling that said the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to guns only in the face of federal regulation, not against state and municipal restrictions. Included among 10 new disputes the justices added to their calendar Wednesday for the upcoming 2009-10 term, which begins next Monday, the guns case brings the court back to a sensational topic that pits uniquely American notions of frontier liberty against contemporary worries over urban violence. When the justices heard a case on the subject in March 2008, people began lining up in front of the court’s columned building two days early for a seat. (Article continues below) Shop Earthhope Magazines The new dispute began in Chicago, which has a handgun ban similar to a Washington, D.C., ordinance that the Supreme Court struck down in June 2008 as a violation of the Second Amendment. In the 2008 case, District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court for the first time declared an individual right to firearms for self-defense and rejected a prevailing lower court view that the Second Amendment applied only to state “militia,” such as National Guard units. But the 5-4 decision left open a crucial question that could have more practical consequences for gun owners and for the states that would regulate them: Does the Second Amendment apply to the states and localities as it does to federal jurisdiction of Washington, D.C.? Because the Supreme Court has so rarely taken up Second Amendment cases, the amendment’s coverage in the states has never been fully determined — unlike the breadth of many of the other of the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights. Thirty-four states had asked the Supreme Court to take up the gun advocates’ appeals and a separate one filed by the National Rifle Association against Chicago. (The justices did not act on that petition Wednesday.) Led by Texas state lawyers, 33 of the 34 states said in a joint filing, “Without this court’s review (of the Chicago cases), millions of Americans may be deprived of their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.” California separately urged the court to take the Chicago disputes. “I have every confidence the Supreme Court will say that it is a freedom to be enjoyed by the entire American people not just those in federal enclaves,” said Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the NRA. “There’s no question that if the court applies the Second Amendment to the states that will encourage more challenges to gun laws,” said Dennis Henigan, a vice president at the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “But when the dust clears, it is quite likely this decision will leave intact virtually all the state laws out there.” Henigan noted that the cases that have made it to the Supreme Court in recent terms have involved outright, but rare, bans and that lower courts so far have not been skeptical of registration and other less stringent firearms regulation. Chicago adopted its handgun ban in 1982, city officials told the high court, because of a rise in firearms-related deaths and because officials believed handguns were playing “a major role in the commission of homicide, aggravated assaults and armed robbery.” The legal dispute specifically tests whether the Second Amendment — written more than two centuries ago to cover only the federal government — may be extended to the states, as the First Amendment and many other protections of the Bill of Rights have been through 20th Century court rulings. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, which covers Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana, said the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. The appeals court stressed that the historical view of the Supreme Court was the amendment restricted the powers of the federal government. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit took the opposite view in a decision earlier this year. A third U.S. appeals court, the New York-based 2nd Circuit, entered the controversy when it ruled in January that the Second Amendment does not cover the states. Then-Appeals Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor joined the opinion rejecting a challenge to a New York ban on certain weapons used in martial arts. That decision in Maloney v. Cuomo provoked some gun-rights groups to protest Sotomayor’s nomination. The NRA and other gun-rights advocates urged senators to vote against Sotomayor because of the Maloney v. Cuomo ruling. Lawyer Alan Gura, who represented the challengers to the Washington, D.C., ordinance two years ago, represents the Chicago gun owners. Gura stressed in his petitions that lower courts disagree about the extent of individuals’ right to have guns. The case, McDonald v. City of Chicago, is likely to be scheduled for January. A decision would come before the end of the term in late June 2010. Source: USA Today .
Read more from the original source:
Link here/a>
Supreme Court Returns to Firearms Fray
Posted by admin in general news on September 30th, 2009
Supreme Court Returns to Firearms Fray by Joan Biskupic USA Today September 30, 2009 WASHINGTON, DC The U.S. Supreme Court announced Wednesday it will return to the controversy over individual gun rights by hearing an appeal from a group of firearms owners in Chicago. They are challenging a lower appeals court ruling that said the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to guns only in the face of federal regulation, not against state and municipal restrictions. Included among 10 new disputes the justices added to their calendar Wednesday for the upcoming 2009-10 term, which begins next Monday, the guns case brings the court back to a sensational topic that pits uniquely American notions of frontier liberty against contemporary worries over urban violence. When the justices heard a case on the subject in March 2008, people began lining up in front of the court’s columned building two days early for a seat. (Article continues below) Shop Earthhope Magazines The new dispute began in Chicago, which has a handgun ban similar to a Washington, D.C., ordinance that the Supreme Court struck down in June 2008 as a violation of the Second Amendment. In the 2008 case, District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court for the first time declared an individual right to firearms for self-defense and rejected a prevailing lower court view that the Second Amendment applied only to state “militia,” such as National Guard units. But the 5-4 decision left open a crucial question that could have more practical consequences for gun owners and for the states that would regulate them: Does the Second Amendment apply to the states and localities as it does to federal jurisdiction of Washington, D.C.? Because the Supreme Court has so rarely taken up Second Amendment cases, the amendment’s coverage in the states has never been fully determined — unlike the breadth of many of the other of the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights. Thirty-four states had asked the Supreme Court to take up the gun advocates’ appeals and a separate one filed by the National Rifle Association against Chicago. (The justices did not act on that petition Wednesday.) Led by Texas state lawyers, 33 of the 34 states said in a joint filing, “Without this court’s review (of the Chicago cases), millions of Americans may be deprived of their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.” California separately urged the court to take the Chicago disputes. “I have every confidence the Supreme Court will say that it is a freedom to be enjoyed by the entire American people not just those in federal enclaves,” said Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the NRA. “There’s no question that if the court applies the Second Amendment to the states that will encourage more challenges to gun laws,” said Dennis Henigan, a vice president at the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “But when the dust clears, it is quite likely this decision will leave intact virtually all the state laws out there.” Henigan noted that the cases that have made it to the Supreme Court in recent terms have involved outright, but rare, bans and that lower courts so far have not been skeptical of registration and other less stringent firearms regulation. Chicago adopted its handgun ban in 1982, city officials told the high court, because of a rise in firearms-related deaths and because officials believed handguns were playing “a major role in the commission of homicide, aggravated assaults and armed robbery.” The legal dispute specifically tests whether the Second Amendment — written more than two centuries ago to cover only the federal government — may be extended to the states, as the First Amendment and many other protections of the Bill of Rights have been through 20th Century court rulings. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, which covers Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana, said the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. The appeals court stressed that the historical view of the Supreme Court was the amendment restricted the powers of the federal government. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit took the opposite view in a decision earlier this year. A third U.S. appeals court, the New York-based 2nd Circuit, entered the controversy when it ruled in January that the Second Amendment does not cover the states. Then-Appeals Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor joined the opinion rejecting a challenge to a New York ban on certain weapons used in martial arts. That decision in Maloney v. Cuomo provoked some gun-rights groups to protest Sotomayor’s nomination. The NRA and other gun-rights advocates urged senators to vote against Sotomayor because of the Maloney v. Cuomo ruling. Lawyer Alan Gura, who represented the challengers to the Washington, D.C., ordinance two years ago, represents the Chicago gun owners. Gura stressed in his petitions that lower courts disagree about the extent of individuals’ right to have guns. The case, McDonald v. City of Chicago, is likely to be scheduled for January. A decision would come before the end of the term in late June 2010. Source: USA Today .
View original post here:
Link here/a>
L.A. Times Still Conceals Obama Terror Video
L.A. Times Still Conceals Obama Terror Video by Aaron Klein WND September 30, 2009 JERUSALEM, Isarael Rashid Khalidi The Los Angeles Times has no plan to ever release a video it stated it obtained of President Obama attending an anti-Israel event in which he delivered a glowing testimonial for Rashid Khalidi, a pro-Palestinian professor who excuses terrorism. At the 2003 event, poetry reportedly was read comparing Israelis to Osama bin Laden and accusing the Jewish state of terrorism. “The story ran in 2008 and we pretty much said everything we are going to say about that event,” Peter Wallsten, the Times reporter who claimed to have obtained the video, told WND yesterday. Asked for details of the footage captured in the video, Wallsten replied, “I wrote an extensive article that described the event.” (Article continues below) Shop Earthhope Magazines Wallsten referred to a previous statement from the newspaper’s editor, Russ Stanton, explaining, “The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it.” “The Times keeps its promises to sources,” Stanton said. But that explanation did not stop the camp of then-Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain from demanding the release of the video. McCain spokesman Michael Goldfarb accused the Times of “intentionally suppressing information that could provide a clearer link between Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi.” “The election is one week away, and it’s unfortunate that the press so obviously favors Barack Obama that this campaign must publicly request that the Los Angeles Times do its job – make information public,” Goldfarb said at the time. During the campaign, the blogosphere was abuzz with accusations alleging the Times was holding the video back because it contains embarrassing moments that would be damaging for Obama. Andrew C. McCarthy, chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies’ Center for Law & Counterterrorism, claimed in an October 2008 piece in National Review Online the Times would have jumped at the chance of making such images public if McCain had been involved. “Let’s try a thought experiment,” begins McCarthy. “Say John McCain attended a party at which known racists and terror mongers were in attendance. Say testimonials were given, including a glowing one by McCain for the benefit of the guest of honor … who happened to be a top apologist for terrorists. Say McCain not only gave a speech but stood by, in tacit approval and solidarity, while other racists and terror mongers gave speeches that reeked of hatred for an American ally and rationalizations of terror attacks. “Now let’s say the Los Angeles Times obtained a videotape of the party. “Question: Is there any chance – any chance – the Times would not release the tape and publish front-page story after story about the gory details, with the usual accompanying chorus of sanctimony from the oped commentariat? Is there any chance, if the Times was the least bit reluctant about publishing (remember, we’re pretending here), that the rest of the mainstream media (y’know, the guys who drove Trent Lott out of his leadership position over a birthday-party toast) would not be screaming for the release of the tape?” McCarthy asked. The video the Times said it obtained reportedly captures Obama delivering an in-person testimonial for Khalidi, who at the time was departing the University of Chicago for a new teaching position at Columbia University in New York. In a piece in April 2008, Wallsten reported that while praising Khalidi, Obama reminisced about conversations over meals prepared by the professor’s wife, Mona Khalidi. Unreported by Wallsten was that the event was sponsored by Mona Khalidi’s anti-Israel Arab American Action Network, which, as WND first reported, received large sums of money from the Woods Fund, an ultra-liberal Chicago nonprofit for which Obama served as a board member alongside Weather Underground radical William Ayers. According to Wallsten’s account of the farewell dinner, Obama said his talks with the Khalidis served as “consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases. … It’s for that reason that I’m hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation – a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid’s dinner table,” but around “this entire world.” Khalidi’s farewell dinner was replete with anti-Israel speakers. One, a young Palestinian American, recited a poem in Obama’s presence that accused the Israeli government of terrorism in its treatment of Palestinians and sharply criticized U.S. support of Israel, the Times reported. Another speaker, who reportedly talked while Obama was present, compared “Zionist settlers on the West Bank” to Osama bin Laden. In the kicker, Wallsten wrote, “The event was videotaped, and a copy of the tape was obtained by The Times.” But that detail went largely unnoticed until October 2008, when the Gateway Pundit blog made an issue of the tape. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel. He has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti-Western terrorism and was labeled by the State Department as a terror group. During documented speeches and public events, Khalidi has called Israel an “apartheid system in creation” and a destructive “racist” state. He has multiple times expressed support for Palestinian terror, calling suicide bombings a response to “Israeli aggression.” He dedicated his 1986 book, “Under Siege,” to “those who gave their lives … in defense of the cause of Palestine and independence of Lebanon.” Critics assailed the book as excusing Palestinian terrorism. Obama, Khalidi closely tied According to a professor at the University of Chicago who said he has known Obama for 12 years, Obama first befriended Khalidi when the two worked together at the university. The professor spoke on condition of anonymity. Khalidi lectured at the University of Chicago until 2003, while Obama taught law there from 1993 until his election to the Senate in 2004. Khalidi in 2000 held what was described as a successful fundraiser for Obama’s failed bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, a fact not denied by Khalidi. Speaking in a joint interview with WND and the John Batchelor radio show, Khalidi was asked about his 2000 fundraiser for Obama. “I was just doing my duties as a Chicago resident to help my local politician,” Khalidi stated. Khalidi said he supports Obama for president “because he is the only candidate who has expressed sympathy for the Palestinian cause.” Khalidi also lauded Obama for “saying he supports talks with Iran. If the U.S. can talk with the Soviet Union during the Cold War, there is no reason it can’t talk with the Iranians.” In 2001, the Woods Fund, which describes itself as a group helping the disadvantaged, provided a $40,000 grant to Mona Khalidi’s Arab American Action Network, or AAAN. The fund provided a second grant to the AAAN for $35,000 in 2002. Speakers at AAAN dinners and events routinely have taken an anti-Israel line. The group co-sponsored a Palestinian art exhibit titled “The Subject of Palestine” that featured works related to what some Palestinians call the “Nakba,” or “catastrophe” of Israel’s founding in 1948. Obama borrowed phrase from Khalidi? In May 2008, WND noted Obama termed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a “constant sore” in an interview just five days after Khalidi wrote an opinion piece in the Nation magazine in which he called the “Palestinian question” a “running sore.” In his piece, “Palestine: Liberation Deferred,” Khalidi suggested Israel carried out “ethnic cleansing” of Palestinians and Western powers backed Israel’s establishment due to guilt of the Holocaust. He lamented the Palestinian Authority’s stated acceptance of a Palestinian state “only” in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and eastern sections of Jerusalem, and he argued Israel should be dissolved and instead a bi-national, cantonal system should be set up in which Jews and Arabs reside. Source: WorldNetDaily Photo: Alex Evac .
Here is the original post:
Link here/a>
1738 Earn $200/Weekly without invest!
Free to Join from anywhere Paid to Self clicks - $.1 to $.10 Per Click Paid for clicks of Referral -100% Only Paid PTC with Proof, No Scam ! Click on Join Free http://tinyurl.com/1738-ht
Original post:
Link here/a>
1738 Earn $200/Weekly without invest!
Free to Join from anywhere Paid to Self clicks - $.1 to $.10 Per Click Paid for clicks of Referral -100% Only Paid PTC with Proof, No Scam ! Click on Join Free http://tinyurl.com/1738-ht
Here is the original:
Link here/a>
IObit Security 360 1.0
IObit Security 360 is an advanced malware & spyware removal utility that detects, removes the deepest infections, and protects your PC from various of potential spyware, adware, trojans, keyloggers, bots, worms, and hijackers. With the unique “Dual-Core” engine and the heuristic malware detection, IObit Security 360 detects the most complex and deepest spyware and malware in a very fast and efficient way. IObit Security 360 has a real-time malware protection and frequent automatic updating for prevention of zero-day security threats. IObit Security 360 can work with your Antivirus for a superior PC security. 177,111 Download every week. Support for Windows 2003, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows NT. IObit Download here : http://shorturl.cz.cc/2645de
More:
Link here/a>
LimeWire 5.2.13
From its start as a post-Napster clone to its leading role as the quintessential Gnutella client, LimeWire is the highest-profile P2P application. Version 5 re-envisions LimeWire for a Web 2.0 world, with an emphasis on sharing with friends, square buttons with rounded corners, and overall a cleaner interface. Two search bars and two sidebars cap off the redesign. The uppermost search bar is the global search that scans what everybody is sharing over the P2P network, while the secondary one on the right searches your library. The sidebars are set up in a similar way. Both are on the left, with the outer one offering three options: your library, the global P2P network, and your friends. Click on My Library and your inner sidebar shows your collection of music, movies, and documents. The P2P Network option shows what you’re uploading and downloading, while the Friends option lets you share your library specifically with your Google/Jabber contacts, which you can import. Search results can be presented in both the new Web 2.0-style that surfaces just the most relevant information, with an Information button to dive deeper or the “classic” spreadsheet view. The Advanced Tools feature is also new, which lets power users drill down and get highly specific information about who they’re connected to, similar to what’s available from torrent clients. This data includes IP addresses, bandwidth, the program being used and its version. The new features and overall functionality make this by far the most mature version of LimeWire to date. Despite the typical performance flaws found in all file-sharing clients, this latest version continues to offer solid performance and good looks across the board. 553,340 Download every week. Support for Windows Vista, Windows 95, Windows Me, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows NT, Windows 98. LimeWire Download here : http://shorturl.cz.cc/e2ea
More:
Link here/a>